Cabinet Chaillot - Jurinea
Action for Infringement

Jurinea Form 197
Parties to the case BACCARA (Mark)
versus BACCARA (Mark)

12-01-98, Chambre commerciale (Appeal to the Supreme Court)
Domain
--- Issue of law
Result
Proceedings
--- Sufficient statement of the claims (New Code of Civil Procedure art: 455) Yes
--- Existence of a non examined stated means (New Code of Civil Procedure art: 455) No
Enacting terms: Order on the ground of Art 700 NCPC 1,524 Euros
Order to pay costs to the defendant Yes

Publication(s): PIBD 1999, Ref.: 669, III, 46

03-08-96, CA de Paris (Appeal)
Domain
--- Issue of law
Result
Validity of the mark Yes
--- Distinctivity of the mark
------ Vehicles
Yes
Speciality of goods and/or services
--- Similarity of goods or services
------ Vehicles - and - Insurance services
No
Proceedings
--- Absence of ground to the action in infrigement Yes
Publication(s): D. I.R. 1996, Ref.: p.109
PIBD 1996, Ref.: 611, III, 280

04-06-93, TGI de Paris (First Instance)
Domain
--- Issue of law
Result
Validity of the mark Yes
--- Distinctivity of the mark
------ Vehicles
Yes
Speciality of goods and/or services
--- Similarity of goods or services
------ Vehicles - and - Insurance services
Yes
--- Complementarity of goods or services
------ Vehicles - and - Insurance services
Yes
Infringement of the mark Yes
Comparaison of the signs
--- Reproduction as such Yes
Enacting terms: Invalidation of the mark Yes
Damages 12,195 Euros
Order on the ground of Art 700 NCPC 1,067 Euros

Publication(s): PIBD 1993, Ref.: 549, III, 488

Last updating : 12-10-06
Copyright © Cabinet Chaillot 1997 - 2004