Cabinet Chaillot - Jurinea Action for Infringement Jurinea Form 370 Parties to the case EAU DYNAMISANTE (Mark) versus TONISSIMA EAU STIMULANTE (Denomination) 11-05-97, TGI de Paris (First Instance) Domain --- Issue of law Result Validity of the mark Yes --- Distinctivity of the mark ------ Toilet water Yes --- Designation of the essential quality of the product ------ Toilet water No Infringement of the mark Yes --- Illicite imitation of the mark Yes Comparaison of the signs --- Visual similitude Yes --- Likelihood of confusion (Intellectual Property Code art: L.713-3) Yes --- Phonetic similitude Yes --- Intellectual similitude Yes Enacting terms: Damages 7,622 Euros Publication(s): PIBD 1998, Ref.: 649, III, 142

Last updating : 12-10-06
Copyright © Cabinet Chaillot 1997 - 2004