Cabinet Chaillot - Jurinea French Marks
Domain in question: Validity of the mark
Issue of law in question: Anteriority of the rights derived from the distinctive sign

L. 711-4

Jurinea Form 191
LE JOURNAL ENTREPRENDRE (Mark); v/ ENTREPRENDRE 92 (Work title); Result for the domain Result for the issue of law
04-07-93, TGI de Paris, First Instance
Yes Yes

Jurinea Form 420
BNF DIFFUSION (Trade name); BNF DIFFUSION (Mark); BNF DIFFUSION EMPLOI = SOLIDARITE (Complex mark); v/ BNF (Initials); Result for the domain Result for the issue of law
01-21-98, TGI de Paris, First Instance
No Yes
09-18-98, CA de Paris, Appeal
No No

Jurinea Form 455
EUROFONTE (Trade name); EURO-FONTE (Company name); v/ EUROFONTE (Complex mark); Result for the domain Result for the issue of law
02-26-97, CA de Paris, Appeal
Yes No

Jurinea Form 602
EXPLORER (Mark); v/ HP EXPLORER (Denomination); Result for the domain Result for the issue of law
06-26-98, CA de Paris, Appeal
No Yes

Jurinea Form 608
PAT (Mark); PUPUCE (Mark); PUPUCE (Denomination); v/ PAT (Denomination); Result for the domain Result for the issue of law
02-27-98, CA de Paris, Appeal
Yes No

Jurinea Form 680
SYMPHONIE MAJEURE, LA THALASSO EN RE (Mark); v/ THALASSOTHERAPIE EN RE MAJEUR (Use in advertising); SYMPHONIE EN RE (Use in advertising); Result for the domain Result for the issue of law
05-05-99, CA de Paris, Appeal
Yes No

Jurinea Form 1147
TAMAGOTCHI (Figurative mark); TAMAGOTCHI (Game); v/ LES PERSONNAGES ET ANIMAUX DES JEUX VIRTUELS (Advertisement); (Seizure-infringement); Result for the domain Result for the issue of law
10-19-01, CA de Paris, Appeal
Yes No


Return to the list of issues of law
Return to the list of domains
Last updating : 12-10-06
Copyright © Cabinet Chaillot 1997 - 2004