Cabinet Chaillot - Jurinea French Marks Domain in question: Comparaison of the signs Issue of law in question: Identical suffix Jurinea Form 22 RICHES MONTS (Complex mark); RICHES MONTS (Trade name); RICHES MONTS (Complex mark); RICHES MONTS (Trade name); RICHEMONT (Complex mark); RICHES MONTS (Complex mark); v/ MILLEMONT (Mark); Result for the domain Result for the issue of law 10-25-91, TGI de Paris, First Instance Yes Jurinea Form 389 KICKERS (Mark); v/ YOUKERS (Mark); Result for the domain Result for the issue of law 03-12-97, CA de Paris, Appeal Yes Jurinea Form 395 ETONIC (Mark); v/ DIATONIC (Mark); Result for the domain Result for the issue of law 05-28-97, CA de Paris, Appeal Yes Jurinea Form 538 CARTE NOIRE (Mark); v/ LABEL NOIR (Mark); Result for the domain Result for the issue of law 04-29-93, CA de Paris, Appeal Yes Jurinea Form 544 VIN FOU (Mark); v/ FRUIT FOU (Mark); Result for the domain Result for the issue of law 10-27-92, Chambre commerciale, Appeal to the Supreme Court Yes Jurinea Form 548 POUPIE (Mark); v/ PULPIE (Mark); Result for the domain Result for the issue of law 04-16-92, CA de Paris, Appeal Yes Jurinea Form 550 BEAUTIFUL EYES (Mark); v/ BRIGHT EYES (Mark); Result for the domain Result for the issue of law 05-26-92, CA de Paris, Appeal Yes Jurinea Form 719 DANIEL ELISE (Mark); DANIEL ELISE IN SQUARE (Mark); v/ DANELISE (Signboard); DANELYSE (Company name); Result for the domain Result for the issue of law 10-22-99, CA de Paris, Appeal Yes Return to the list of issues of law Return to the list of domains

Last updating : 12-10-06
Copyright © Cabinet Chaillot 1997 - 2004